The United States has updated its decades-old science and technology agreement with China, reflecting the evolving dynamics of their competition in critical technologies. Signed recently in Beijing, the revised pact narrows its focus to basic research, explicitly excluding fields like artificial intelligence and quantum computing that are pivotal for economic and military dominance. The agreement also introduces enhanced safeguards to protect intellectual property, researcher safety, and national security.
According to the U.S. State Department, the renewed agreement maintains a strong emphasis on transparency and safeguards against unauthorised sharing of sensitive information. Meanwhile, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology acknowledged the signing without disclosing further details. This updated framework extends the partnership for another five years, underscoring both nations’ cautious approach to maintaining collaborative ties amid increasing geopolitical tensions.
A History of Collaboration Under Scrutiny
The original agreement was forged in 1979, during a period of diplomatic rapprochement aimed at countering Soviet influence. At the time, China lagged significantly in scientific and technological development compared to the U.S. Renewed every five years, the agreement has facilitated collaboration on a range of issues, from disease prevention to environmental research.
However, rising tensions and concerns over China’s growing technological capabilities have led the U.S. to re-evaluate the terms. Restrictions on exporting advanced semiconductors and a clampdown on U.S. investments in critical Chinese technologies signal Washington’s efforts to curb China’s advancements in military and economic spheres. Furthermore, the Trump administration’s now-defunct initiative against Chinese espionage cast a shadow over academic and institutional collaborations, cooling scientific exchanges.
Balancing Collaboration and Security
Experts view the revised agreement as a measured step to maintain mutual benefits while safeguarding national interests. Deborah Seligsohn of Villanova University highlighted the reduction in government-to-government programs under the new framework, allowing cooperation to persist in a more controlled manner. Congressional leaders, including Rep. Gregory Meeks, underscored the global benefits of past collaborations but stressed the need for oversight to ensure alignment with U.S. values.
As the U.S.-China rivalry deepens, the updated agreement seeks to balance scientific partnerships with the imperative to protect national security, signaling a new era in bilateral cooperation.